If you've got a Notice to Appear and something's changed since it was issued, you're usually looking at one of two procedural tools. They solve different problems, and picking the wrong one wastes time you may not have.
A Motion to Continue asks the immigration judge for more time before your existing hearing — same court, later date. A Motion to Change Venue asks to move your case to a different immigration court entirely, usually because you've relocated. Some people need both at once: a venue change plus a bit of extra time while it's sorted out.
Filing either motion does not cancel your hearing. Your existing hearing date stays on the calendar until a judge actually grants the motion. If your hearing is coming up before you expect a ruling, the safest move is to still appear — in person or however the court has authorized — while the motion is pending.
Often, yes — many continuance requests for routine reasons (like needing time to find a lawyer) are handled orally right at a Master Calendar Hearing. A written motion becomes more important when your hearing is a detained case, a merits hearing, or you can't wait until the hearing date to ask. A venue change, by contrast, almost always needs a written motion, since it has to identify your new address and satisfy the good-cause factors a judge will weigh on paper.
This is common: someone moves, needs the case transferred, and also needs a short continuance while the venue motion is pending. Filing both together, with a consistent set of facts across each document, tends to go more smoothly than filing them separately weeks apart.
Answer five quick questions and we'll tell you — honestly, including if the answer is "neither, you need a full consultation."
Start the free checkThis page is for general information only and isn't legal advice about your specific case. Back to ImmigrationCourtDate